This is the basic of what’s Constitutional and what is Political "Correctness", in other words, Political Discrimination being disseminated by Left Wing Groups like the DNC, ACLU, Soros funded Non-Profits is unconstitutional.. The basics of Discrimination is racism (discriminate based upon a person's skin color or ancestry), Whether the discrimination is based upon a person's skin, political beliefs, religious beliefs, or any other "Thought", that is "Thought Control" and the Democrat Party and the Left-wing of the political spectrum is very good with practicing discrimination and then blaming their enemies for their own actions..

The Pacific Legal Foundation is taking this case all the way to the Supreme court. They claim that the Liberals inhibiting the government are discriminating against the Sea Scouts because of their affiliation with the BSA (Boy Scouts of America) and the BSA's right of association guaranteed to them under the US Constitution, the City of Berkeley has violated their 1st amendment and 14th Amendment rights under the Constitution:

The First Amendment to the United States Constitution
provides in pertinent part, “Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free
exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech . . . .”

The Fourteenth Amendment, Section 1, of the United
States Constitution provides in pertinent part, “No state
shall . . . deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.”

Liberals, do not want the United States Constitution to be enforced or defined accurately, they want it to say "No religion allowed anywhere" and the 14th Amendment to say "Only associate with groups we certify as acceptable and no other". This is what they call having a "Living Constitution".

It's tyranny in any other definition.

Heads up to Stop the ACLU for this and to the Pacific Legal Foundation for their work protecting our Constitutional rights from Anti-American and Anti-Constitutional groups like the ACLU and Liberals in General.

You can read the Appeal to the US Supreme Court HERE


Press Release from the Pacific Legal Foundation:

Berkeley Sea Scout Decision Appealed to United States Supreme Court

Contact: Harold Johnson
Phone: (916) 419-7111

Sacramento,CA; July 11, 2006: Pacific Legal Foundation announced today that it has appealed to the United States Supreme Court to review and reverse the California Supreme Court’s decision allowing the City of Berkeley to discriminate against the Berkeley Sea Scouts, because of their affiliation with the Boy Scouts of America.

Berkeley operates a program for community-oriented nonprofit organizations that allows them free use of the Berkeley Marina. However, Berkeley prohibits the Berkeley Sea Scouts from participating in this program, because the Sea Scouts are affiliated with the Boy Scouts of America and Berkeley officials hold ideological objections to the values and membership policies of the Boy Scouts of America. Berkeley has never identified a single exclusionary act by the Sea Scouts; it is barring them from the program for nonprofits solely because of their ties with the Boy Scouts.

In a March decision, the California Supreme Court upheld Berkeley’s policy of denying the Sea Scouts access to the berthing program for nonprofits.

Representing the skipper of the Berkeley Sea Scout program, Pacific Legal Foundation attorneys have appealed the California Supreme Court’s ruling to the United States Supreme Court.

"Berkeley is penalizing the Sea Scouts for exercising their First Amendment right of association in ways that city officials don’t like," said PLF attorney, Harold Johnson, co-counsel in the case. "May government punish you, or fine you, or subject you to second class treatment if you don’t pass a politically correct litmus test? That’s the question raised by this case. It’s a question that deserves to be heard by the United States Supreme Court."

The Berkeley Sea Scouts is a multi-ethnic group whose members come from all economic backgrounds. Berkeley’s exclusion of the Sea Scouts has imposed financial hardships on the organization. The monthly berth fee of more than $500 that the Sea Scouts must pay has led to cutbacks in programs and less financial assistance available for kids from poor families.

"The bottom line is that Berkeley officials are punishing the kids that participate in the Sea Scouts to make a political statement, and that’s a real tragedy," Johnson said.

For 50 years, the Sea Scouts have taught Bay Area kids to sail, and learn carpentry and plumbing by working on the Scouts’ ship in the Berkeley Marina. Like other local nonprofits, Berkeley allowed the group to berth at the marina for free. But in 1998, Berkeley officials demanded the group sever its affiliation with the Boy Scouts. Berkeley officials were retaliating against the Boy Scouts because of the BSA’s traditional values and membership policies—even though those policies are protected by the First Amendment, according to the United States Supreme Court.

When the Sea Scouts declined to sign a statement of policy that would have had the effect of ending their lifelong relationship with the Boy Scouts, Berkeley halted its half-century tradition of granting the Sea Scouts a free berth and began charging the group a $500 a month fee.

As things stand, while some minority, low-income Sea Scouts members have had to drop out of the popular youth program because its finances are strapped, free berthing has been allowed for other groups, including the Berkeley Yacht Club, the Cal Sailing Club, and the Nautilus Institute.

PLF attorneys argued to the state Supreme Court that Berkeley’s fee amounts to fining the Sea Scouts for exercising First Amendment freedoms, specifically the Sea Scouts’ right to associate with the Boy Scouts of America. As Justice Roger Traynor of the California Supreme Court wrote in a famous freedom-of-expression case (Danskin v. San Diego Unified School District (1946)), once government creates a program or facility for the public, "it cannot demand tickets of admission in the form of convictions and affiliations that it deems acceptable."

"Although enunciated in a state court case, the principle voiced by Traynor is consistent with the United States Supreme Court’s cases defending First Amendment rights," said PLF’s Johnson. "For this reason, we hope that the High Court will accept the case and right the wrong being done to the Berkeley Sea Scouts."

About Pacific Legal Foundation
Pacific Legal Foundation is the oldest and largest public interest legal organization dedicated to property rights, balanced environmental policy, and limited government.


# # #

 It has happened every year since 9/11, but because it is Democrats doing it, it's ok.. You will also hear the press jump on any republican who even mentions 9/11 in their campaign as "Politicizing 9/11", but will give generous passes to any democrat who does so as "Heroic".

Read More Here at Redstate

 It was bound to happen, and none too soon. Judge Royce C. Lamberth was tossed off the Indian Trust Case by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia for "on several occasions the district court or its appointees exceeded the role of impartial arbiter by issuing orders without hearings and by actively participating in evidence-gathering." Also Judge Royce C. Lamberth "the July 12 opinion levels serious charges against Interior and its officials, charges that not only bear no relationship to the issue pending before the court, but also go beyond criticizing Interior for its serious failures as trustee and condemn the Department as
an institution." and third, Judge Royce C. Lamberth exercised poor judgement and bias when making his "Rulings", according to the Court of Appeals, Judge Lamberth "In short, in case after case the district court granted extensive relief against Interior, and in case after case we reversed, even under highly deferential standards of review.", basically, 8 appeals were made against 8 of Judge Lamberth's rulings, and all 8 appeals were overturned with prejeduce. The Appeals court has gotten tired of doing Judge Lamberth's job and Judge Lamberth, in the past 10 years, has become a mouthpiece for the Anti-America George Soros Tides foundation.

Eloise Cobell is a Director of the Tides Foundation, although having an ancesteral history within the Blackfoot Tribe, her politics and activism are acts against her own Native American roots. In filing this lawsuit for George Soros and the Tides Foundation, she has prevented Native Americans from accessing even the simplest of information from the Department of the Interior about personal claims, Federal Recognition, and Legal relief of other Native American Claims, requests, and assistance. For 10 years the Cobell lawsuit has thrown a huge monkeywrench into the gears of the Federal Government in dealing with the Soverign Nations of Native American in this nation, to the point that lives are being lost and cultures are being destroyed. How do I know this? I am Native American and I can't even get my teeth fixed or educate my family because these Hateful Socialists have done everything in their power to shut down the Federal Government. The Soros backed plaintifs in this case have said they represent 500,000 plus Native Americans, what they do not say, and is in the fine print of their legal paperwork is they they are suing for Billions of Dollars, but not one Dime, not one Penny will go to Individual Native Americans. Cobell says that the case is "to force the government to account for the money, and to bring about permanent reform of the system." and that the class action is to "to force the federal government to account for billions of dollars belonging to approximately 500,000 American Indians and their heirs, and held in trust since the late 19th century.". In other words, Cobell is claiming that the Federal Government owes native Americans Billions of dollars held in trust in the form of public lands, natural resources, and money from gold, oil, and mineral claims that were paid to the Federal government and a portion of which is to be paid to native americans as royalties. A nobel cause to be sure, but the way they are going about it is the complete opposite of how the Soros group is advertising it. Instead they hope to gain Billions of Dollars (Approx 13 Billion to be exact) from the Federal Government that will go into a "Trust Fund" to be handled by the Tides Foundation itself.. In otherwords, the money will go to elect socialist anti-american politicians into office who hold "Progressive" beliefs and not individual Native American Trust Account Holders. (Progressive is a codeword for Communism). George Soros and his minions want to use Taxpayer money to overthrow the US Constitution and remove the "Republic" and replace it with "Progressive Socialism".

Court Decisions:
Lamberth Removal | IT Injunction

 We can only hope this is true and will actually achieve results.

From Reuters:

Republican says US readying crackdown on leaks
Tue Jul 11, 2006 8:32 PM ET



By David Morgan

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Bush administration is preparing a crackdown on intelligence leaks to the media and will try to pursue prosecutions in some recent cases, the chairman of the House of Representatives Intelligence Committee on Tuesday.

Michigan Republican Rep. Peter Hoekstra also suggested some unauthorized leaks could have been deliberate attempts to help al Qaeda.

"More frequently than what we would like, we find out that the intelligence community has been penetrated, not necessarily by al Qaeda, but by other nations or organizations," he said.

"I don't have any evidence. But from my perspective, when you have information that is leaked that is clearly helpful to our enemy, you cannot discount that possibility," he added.

In recent months, two major intelligence operations were leaked to the media: the National Security Agency's domestic surveillance program and the Treasury Department's tracking of international banking transactions.

"There will be a renewed effort by the Justice Department in a couple of these cases to go through the entire process ... so they can prosecute," Hoekstra said in a speech to the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank.

Justice Department officials were not immediately available for comment.

Hoekstra also said the newly-installed CIA director Michael Hayden was conducting aggressive internal investigations against leakers.

CIA spokeswoman Jennifer Millerwise Dyck declined to comment on investigations but said Hayden believes greater communication within the agency could eliminate staff frustrations that lead to leaks.

Hoekstra, a staunch ally of President George W. Bush on most intelligence issues, broke with the president in May when he sent the White House an angry letter complaining that his committee had been kept in the dark about still other secret programs, until whistle blowers in the intelligence community told him about them.

In his letter to Bush, Hoekstra said that the U.S. Congress "simply should not have to play 'Twenty Questions' to get the information that it deserves under our Constitution."

From AP:

Judge rules FBI raid on congressman's office was legal

By TONI LOCY
Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) -- An FBI raid on a Louisiana congressman's Capitol Hill office was legal, a federal judge ruled Monday.

Chief U.S. District Judge Thomas F. Hogan said members of Congress are not above the law. He rejected requests from lawmakers and Democratic Rep. William Jefferson to return material seized by the FBI in a May 20-21 search of Jefferson's office.

In a 28-page opinion, Hogan dismissed arguments that the first-ever raid on a congressman's office violated the Constitution's protections against intimidation of elected officials.

"Congress' capacity to function effectively is not threatened by permitting congressional offices to be searched pursuant to validly issued search warrants," said Hogan, who had approved the FBI's request to conduct the overnight search of Jefferson's office.

Jefferson had sought the return of several computer hard drives, floppy disks and two boxes of paper documents that FBI agents seized during an 18-hour search of his Rayburn Building office.

At issue was a constitutional provision known as the speech and debate clause, which protects elected officials from being questioned by the president, a prosecutor or a plaintiff in a lawsuit about their legislative work.

"No one argues that the warrant executed upon Congressman Jefferson's office was not properly administered," Hogan wrote. "Therefore, there was no impermissible intrusion on the Legislature. The fact that some privileged material was incidentally captured by the search does not constitute an unlawful intrusion."

The raid on Jefferson's office angered members of Congress, some of whom threatened to retaliate by tinkering with the FBI and Justice Department budgets.

President Bush stepped in and ordered the solicitor general to take custody of the seized materials so Congress and the Justice Department could work out procedures to deal with similar situations in the future.

The president's 45-day "cooling off period" ended Sunday with no compromise worked out but with assurances from the Justice Department that it would not seek to regain custody of the materials until Hogan ruled on Jefferson's request.

Because Hogan signed the search warrant authorizing the search, Jefferson's legal team was not surprised by his ruling upholding it.

"While a Congressman is not above the law, the executive branch must also follow the law," said Jefferson's lawyer, Robert Trout. "We appreciate the consideration the judge accorded our motion for the return of the seized property, but we respectfully disagree with his conclusion, and we intend to appeal the ruling."

Hogan said a search warrant seeking material is very different than a subpoena seeking testimony.

"Jefferson may never be questioned regarding his legitimate legislative activities, is immune from civil or criminal liability for those activities, and no privileged material may ever be used against him in court," the judge wrote.

Jefferson has been under investigation since March 2005 for allegedly using his position to promote the sale of telecommunications equipment and services offered by iGate, a Louisville-based firm, that sought contracts with Nigeria, Ghana and other African nations.

In return for his help, Jefferson allegedly demanded stock and cash payments. Jefferson has not been charged and has denied wrongdoing.

Order by Judge Thomas F. Hogan:

ORDER
Pending before the Court is Congressman William J. Jefferson’s Motion for Return of
Property and Emergency Motion for Interim Relief. For the reasons stated in the accompanying
Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion for Return of Property is DENIED. It is further
ORDERED that the Emergency Motion for Interim Relief is DISMISSED as moot. It is further
ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed not to seal this Order and the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, and to make those documents available to the public. It is further ORDERED that because the Memorandum issued by President Bush on May 25, 2006, which directed the sealing of the materials seized during the execution of the search warrant at issue here, expired on Sunday, July 9, 2006, the Department of Justice shall be free to regain custody of the seized materials, and to resume its review thereof, as of Monday, July 10, 2006.

SO ORDERED.

July 10, 2006

Read the Case Opinion and the actual Judge's Order here:

 I absolutely do not believe this.. And I totally expected the complete opposite opinions from the Left and have held back posting about this subject till I saw this..

For the past week, since July 2, when the NY post published an article entitled "COPYCATTY COULTER PILFERS PROSE: PRO" By PHILIP RECCHIA. And today's NY Post article "COULTER ON THE CARPET: PLAGIARISM PROBE" By NILES LATHEM Post Correspondent,
Everyone on the Left has jumped on this to slam Ann Coulter.. But wait!

Some of the most far leftwing of the left actually stepped back and asked a simple question: "Wait a second, John Barrie is making all these accusations, but he does not list what she actually plagiarized, we don't know if he is just grumpy or telling the truth!".. First of all, this is a first for the Left, to actually question a fellow Liberal when they make an accusation against a Conservative..

So today, on July 7th, I see on The Daily Kos and article that says "Ann Coulter plagiarism charges overblown" written by the kos himself, that's enough to make one stop and check the temperature. And it's true, the Left do not think that Ann Coulter Plagiarized anything, but is instead questioning the motives of the accuser John Barrie" and think he is basically grandstanding and playing to the "base". I'm serious! Here are some Plagiarized quotes from Koskids:

KOS: "TPM Muckracker has an itemized list of Ann Coulter's supposed plagiarism, and sorry to say, there's not much there.

Coulter is a lot of things, but it doesn't look like plagiarism is one of them.

"


Some random quotes from various koskids:

"My impression as well and I loathe the woman. But two different authors using the same quote is not plagiarism"

"Oh Well, Looks like she goes back to just being a disgraceful human being and a lousy writer."

You judge for yourself about the accusation, and I totally understand why Ann has not replied to any of this.. But I swear the earth just flipped upside down..

UPDATE: Looks like Ann Coulter's Publisher also has cleared her of Plagiarism: From Newsmax

Publisher: Ann Coulter No Plagiarist



The latest media attack on Ann Coulter seems to be a desperate measure to undermine the credibility of one of America’s most prominent conservative voices.

Soon after her book "Godless: The Church of Liberalism” was released in June, Coulter made waves – Hillary accused her of being "heartless” and "vicious” -- for questioning the motives of four 9/11 widows.

With Coulter’s book topping the New York Times’ bestseller list, new allegations are surfacing that Coulter plagiarized material for her book and syndicated news columns.

But the publisher of Coulter’s book, Random House’s Crown imprint, has reviewed the plagiarism allegations and has found them to be baseless.

"We have reviewed the allegations of plagiarism surrounding ‘Godless’ and found them to be as trivial and meritless as they are irresponsible," said Steve Ross, Senior Vice President and Publisher of Crown Publishing Group.

Ross continued: "Any author is entitled to do what Ann Coulter has done in the three snippets cited: research and report facts. The number of words used by our author in these snippets is so minimal that there is no requirement for attribution. As an experienced author and attorney, Ms. Coulter knows when attribution is appropriate, as underscored by the nineteen pages of hundreds of endnotes contained in ‘Godless.’”

In the weeks after "Godless” came out, leftwing blogs began making claims that Coulter had engaged in plagiarism.

Apparently prompted by these reports, the New York Post asked a California firm to review Coulter’s writings with its iThenticate software, a program the checks databases to uncover plagiarism.

The syndicator of Coulter’s newspaper column, Universal Press Syndicate, is also investigating claims of plagiarism and should have a report out this coming week. Universal Press Syndicate has been under pressure for some time from liberal journalists and publications like Editor & Publisher to drop Coutler’s column.

 

 It never fails, the Democrat Party has a Factual History of Racism, but whenever one shows their true colors, the Liberal "Main Stream Media" turns it's back and ignores it.. But let a Republican or Conservative accidently say something, then the Tar and Feathers, and the Lynching ropes come out.. I guess the Dems and Libs learned it all from their KKK Days.

From Newsmax:

Biden's comments were captured by C-Span cameras during a June event in New Hampshire where the likely 2008 presidential candidate was once again making the rounds with voters in this important primary state.

During a conversation with an Indian-American political activist, Biden said: "In Delaware, the largest growth of population is Indian-Americans, moving from India. You cannot go to a 7/11 or a Dunkin' Donuts unless you have a slight Indian accent. I’m not joking."

Slamming Biden for making "ridiculous comments" about the community, the president of the Indian American Republican Council (IARC) in Washington D.C. said in a statement: "Joe Biden has a history of making insensitive and inappropriate remarks . . ."

"In 2004, Sen. John Kerry referred to Sikhs as terrorists and Sen. Hillary Clinton jokingly referred to Mahatma Gandhi as a gas station owner," Dr. Vijay said. "A clear double-standard in the mainstream media will likely ensure Sen. Biden gets a pass over these comments that would get a Republican in deep trouble if he ever made a similar statement.”

Despite the near-total blackout in the mainstream media, the entire incident was captured on a C-Span video clip, which is now spreading rapidly via the Internet.

The Delmarva paper noted that this is not Biden's first faux pas in New Hampshire, which holds the nation's first presidential primary. During his first presidential bid in 1987, Biden told one New Hampshire voter who questioned his law school grades that: "I think I probably have a much higher IQ than you do."

 This looks like the Democrat Party has taken a blow to their attempts to circumvent Constitutional Protections and the Electorial processes to get Democrats into office and take total power.

From AP Wires:

Ky. AG Disqualified From Governor's Case

FRANKFORT, Ky. (AP) - A judge Friday disqualified the state attorney general from any involvement in the prosecution of Gov. Ernie Fletcher, who is under indictment for allegedly rewarding political supporters with state jobs.

Franklin County District Judge David Melcher ruled that prosecutors from Attorney General Greg Stumbo's office can remain on the case.

"The attorney general himself shall play no role in the prosecution of the defendant, and is hereby disqualified from prosecuting or participating in the prosecution of this case," Melcher said in his order.

Fletcher, Kentucky's first Republican governor in more than three decades, has called the Democratic attorney general's investigation of his administration's state hiring practices politically motivated. Last summer, he issued a blanket pardon for anyone in his administration who might face charges - except himself.

The governor is accused of rewarding political supporters with protected state jobs after he took office in 2003.

He pleaded not guilty last month to misdemeanor charges of conspiracy, official misconduct and political discrimination. Trial is scheduled for Nov. 8.

 Here is more misconduct by the Liberal (All the News fit to betray USA) New York Times. Seems Allison Hope Weiner, reporter for NY Times, visited the Jail where convicted Investigator Anthony Pellicano is spending his days lately. She was told that only immediate family or personal lawyers may visit. She said she was a lawyer (She is, but not a practicing lawyer) but was told to come back later and fill out the paperwork. She came back and filled out the paperwork including where it says "Reason", it says "Legal" and not "Interview".. When Pellicano was told by the guard that "His Lawyer" was there to see him, Pellicano did not know why as he thought his Lawyer went out of town the night before. But when he was put into the Interview room and she identified herself as a NY Times Lawyer, Pellicano went ballistic and refused to talk to her and has said he is outraged.. As a result, the NY Times Lawyer is permanently barred from that Jail.

Pellicano's point of View:

"I was upstairs in my cell and was told by the guards that 'my lawyer' was here to see me," he said in a statement relayed by his attorney, Steven F. Gruel. "I told [the guards] I did not think that was possible, because I knew that my only lawyer, Mr. Gruel, had returned to San Francisco the day before."

Pellicano said the guard insisted that his lawyer was waiting and led him down to the meeting room.

"I'm outraged," Pellicano said in the statement. "Based on my knowledge of MDC procedures, I believe this reporter misrepresented herself as my attorney by using her legal bar card to get in to see me."

He said he reported the incident to the warden. Gruel told the jail's legal department what happened.

"I was shocked," Gruel said. "Every time I go to see him … it's like trying to get into Ft. Knox."

You can read the full story about this blatant misrepresentation here

 Just throwing this out there.. With all the Civil Lawsuits about silly things like the Tobacco lawsuits where People are suing for Billions (with a B) of Dollars because of the liberal standard "Tobacco lied about the safety of tobacco", Gun Manufacturers being sued because they do not stop criminals from mudering people.

Why can we not sue "Big Main Stream Media" for lying to us and placing our lives in mortal danger for revealing national security secrets to America's Enemies? Sue them in a Civil Lawsuit and make them Pay Billions of dollars to the affected American Citizens who are now in Mortal Danger because of the bias and active decision by Big Main Stream Media to help the enemy. Just like the Washington Post did in 1983 when they revealed how the US monitors communications of Terrorist and as a direct result, the US missed the planning of the bombing of the US Marine Barracks in Lebenon that murdered 215+ US Marines. If Any Lawyer or Law Firm wants to do this, I will sign onto the Lawsuit in a heartbeat! I can even testify on how I feel more vunerable and helpless to Terrorist Attacks because of the actions of Big Main Stream Media.

 This is the same person who has decided to become part of the Anti-War Activist groups (Watada is an active member of the Anti-American Socialist group "Not in My Name") in violation of UCMJ and yes, Federal Law (Subversive Sedition Laws). Watada Joined the US Army for the sole purpose of refusing to deploy and to attack the US Government itself. His Legal defense and his Activism is bought and paid for by funds from the Anti-American Tides Foundation owned and operated by George Soros.

From AP Wires:

Army to charge officer for refusing to deploy to Iraq

FORT LEWIS, Wash. (AP) -- The Army plans charge an officer who refused last month to deploy to Iraq because he believes the war there is illegal, a Fort Lewis spokeswoman said Wednesday.

Spokeswoman Tammy L. Reed said she did not know what charges 1st Lt. Ehren Watada, 28, would face. The officer has previously said he could face at least two years in prison for failing to obey an order to deploy.

Watada, a member of the Army's first Stryker Brigade Combat Team, refused to go to Iraq after researching the war and determining it to be illegal. He said he would be willing to serve in Afghanistan or elsewhere. The Army refused to allow him to resign his commission.

Watada's stance prompted rallies of support near Fort Lewis, in Seattle and in Honolulu, his hometown.

Once charges are filed, Watada would face a preliminary military hearing.

Town Hall's Language censor is too strict to post anything about this story. So surf the web and hopefully you will find the whole story..

 I did not think it would take long for Liberals and Democrats to applaud the death of Ken Lay, accuse the Bush Administration of Murdering him, or even faked his own death. It was a sad day when these anti-American Liberals and democrats when they found that Zarquawi Died at the Hands of the United States military. Their only responses to that major victory was "bummer, that guy was winning the war on terror" and "It's not Osama! so this terrorist leader's death does not count!" type platitudes, the real "Terrorist" in the Minds of Liberals and Democrats are anyone who does not cow toe to the Liberal viewpoint. Kenneth Lay being one of them.. Here are some of the hate spewed by these of the hateful ideology:



(Content edited for profanity)
"[bad cussword] that. Glad the [bad cussword] dead. Too bad he didn't die horribly."

"You want sympathy for this piece of [bad cussword] , go to Free Republi[bad word]."

"Anyone know if Cheney made any recent trips to Colorado? "

"All the time that Chimpy spent on ENRON's corproate jet? I'm sure Kenny Boy knew way too much and that he was too much of an albatross to pardon. They might as well have sent him hunting with Cheney..."

"But does anyone else find the timing of this REALLY suspicious?"

"It's not difficult to induce a heart attack and half the drugs wouldn't stand out unless you specifically looked for them. [bad cussword] , it's possible to induce a heart attack using pure psychology."

"Bush will have to put him on display like Uday & Qasay. Did he have any metal plates in his bones like Uday, or a pacemaker or something we could pull out to verify it's him?"

There's more, but that's the general gist if it.. What do you expect of these hateful people??

Oh, almost forgot to mention it, got an e-mail from a hateful Liberal yesterday.. Wanted me to turn on Anonymous posting on this website so they could perform "Drive-By Liberalism" without showing their faces.. Just like the Terrorist when they wear the Face Masks so they remain Anonymous to perform their hateful attacks on society. This is my House and I will defend it from all enemies, foreign and domestic.. If you want to debate, fine, log in, and state your case in an intelligent manner and it will be posted. If you spew hatred and spite (for example "I hate You, you S$ck!"), then your postings will be flushed to live with the rest of hateful remarks.. If you make threats, you will be forwarded to the proper authorities for prosecution for terrorist activities and Hate Crimes..

To remind everyone, this is the purpose of the website:

“This site is for exposing those who would fight against Freedom, Liberty, and the American way.
It does not matter who they are, nor what color , race, organization, or group they belong to, if a person or persons publicly slams this United States and it’s Constitutionally Guaranteed Republican Form of Government, then their words and actions will be published here for all to see in it’s most basic form. This site will show how their hate for the United States and the ugliness of their remarks and actions.”

If you have not noticed yet, this site is dedicated to exposing the Hate of the Left Wing in this country.. If you want to view “Right-Wing” or “Unaffiliated” acts against this country, you can go to the hundreds of other websites on the internet to quench your thirst. Also this leftwing nutcase says that because I complain about the left, that I cannot be "Patriotic" so I must stop it.. Tough Cookies, This is America! I will be as Patriotic as I want to be. Our Constitution guarantees that American Citizens are protected from the Federal Government in the exercise of our free speech. It also means that I do not have to put up with the hate spewed from Liberals who want tyranny and supplication to their religious politics. Get that Simon??